###################################################################
# If you used Vina-GPU in your work, please cite:                 #
#                                                                 #
# Tang, S.; Chen, R.; Lin, M.; Lin, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Ding, J.; Hu, H.;#
# Ling, M.; Wu, J. Accelerating AutoDock Vina with GPUs.          #
# Molecules 2022, 27, 3041.                                       #
# https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27093041                       #
#                                                                 #
# And also the origin AutoDock Vina paper:                        #
# O. Trott, A. J. Olson,                                          #
# AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking      #
# with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and         #
# multithreading, Journal of Computational Chemistry 31 (2010)    #
# 455-461                                                         #
#                                                                 #
# DOI 10.1002/jcc.21334                                           #
#                                                                 #
###################################################################

WARNING: The search space volume > 27000 Angstrom^3 (See FAQ)
Reading input ... done.
Setting up the scoring function ... done.
Analyzing the binding site ... done.
Using random seed: -2144903520
Refining results ... done.

mode |   affinity | dist from best mode
     | (kcal/mol) | rmsd l.b.| rmsd u.b.
-----+------------+----------+----------
   1         -6.2      0.000      0.000
   2         -6.1      2.272      6.131
   3         -6.1      2.378      7.550
   4         -6.0      2.511      9.591
   5         -6.0      2.516      9.054
   6         -5.9      3.160      6.793
   7         -5.8      2.473      6.606
   8         -5.8      2.301      7.013
   9         -5.8      2.355      6.203
  10         -5.8      2.309      8.319
  11         -5.8      2.528      6.584
  12         -5.8      2.412      8.364
  13         -5.8      2.447      6.343
  14         -5.8      2.995      9.291
  15         -5.7      4.488     11.555
  16         -5.7      2.408      7.270
  17         -5.7      2.422      6.541
  18         -5.5      2.352      6.749
  19         -5.5      2.399      8.090
  20         -5.4      2.908      7.921
Writing output ... done.